Since the eras
of the culturally rich Greek and Roman empires, everyday citizens have valued
theatrical productions as a means of recreation and as an escape from the
monotony and struggle of real life, if only for a few hours at a time. The business
of theatre has evolved greatly during the 2,000-plus years since, but perhaps
has never undergone as rapid and immense a transformation as it has in the past
100-or-so years. Such developments are rooted in the supplementation and
enhancing of the hedonic value offered by theatrical productions, which serve
as the primary focus of this series of blogs. In this, the first of the three
blogs, I will chronicle the changes and trends the film industry has undergone
since the beginning of the 20th century and how they relate to the
concept of consumer value.
There
are many opinions as to what officially constitutes the first motion picture,
but consensuses holds that it was produced in the last few years before the 20th
century; the first feature film, meanwhile, was Cecil B. Demille’s The Squaw Man in 1914, per The Guardian’s fascinating 2010 historical analysis of Hollywood. (French, 2010) The motion picture represented
a natural progression of the theatre industry, as dictated by technology: the
stories typically reserved for plays, musicals, etc. for centuries upon
centuries could now be permanently captured on film and distributed to masses
of audiences in droves that live theatrical productions could never possibly
reach.
What
began as a modest business at the turn of the 1900s soon ballooned into one of
the biggest hedonic-value-bestowing institutions in Western culture. Hedonic
value, as defined on page 29 of CB, is the “value derived from the immediate
gratification that comes from some activity” (Babin & Harris, 2016); ironically,
going to the movies is the example CB uses as seeking hedonic value. The
University of Houston’s Digital History department published an article in 2016 detailing the early days of Hollywood – which had become shorthand for the
American film industry in general – and how it became a central cultural
institution. “By the end of the [1920s], Hollywood claimed to be the nation’s
fifth largest industry, attracting 83 cents out of every dollar Americans spent
on amusement.” Additionally, by the middle of the 1920s, 50 million Americans –
roughly half of the nation’s population at the time – went to a movie theatre
at least once a week. (“The Rise of Hollywood and the Arrival of Sound”, 2016) During
these early days of its robust growth, Hollywood concentrated on ways to
augment the hedonic value it was capable of offering to consumers. At the time,
this meant incorporating new technologies like sound and color into the films
in attempts to grab even larger shares of the entertainment industry; eventually,
this would manifest itself in animation, special effects, etc. Judging by the
statistics cited by the University of Houston, this strategy of emphasizing building
up hedonic value paid off handsomely for the industry during this era.
The
unprecedented prosperity and popularity Hollywood enjoyed during the first half
of the 1900s would prove unsustainable, though. The advent of television
programming in the middle of the 20th century (and the convenience
it offered) precipitated a decline in per capita movie theatre attendance, a
trend that persists today. Considering The Value Equation, this trend makes
sense. According to this equation, found on page 28 of CB, consumer value is
derived from what one “gets” from a good or service minus what one “gives” to receive
this good or service. (Babin & Harris, 2016) A consumer gives up less time
and money to watch a program, movie, event, etc. from the comfort of his/her
own home than if he/she were to decide to go to the movies. Technology has replicated
the experience once unique to movie theatres and has made it available in
living rooms – and American consumers have responded predictably and rationally
by choosing to stay home. In light of this phenomenon, the American film
industry has been forced to look outside of movie theatres for revenue and has attempted
to adapt to 21st-century viewing habits.
Thank
you for taking the time to read this blog! I hope it provided insight into how
the film industry has adapted over time in order to meet consumer demands. In the
third blog, I will dig deeper into the implications these trends have on the
future of the film industry, but in the next blog I will cover television’s
parallel evolution up to modern day.
Citations:
Babin, B.
J., & Harris, E. G. (2016). CB (Vol. 7), 28 – 29.
French, P. (2010, February 27). How 100 years of Hollywood have charted the history of America. Retrieved from The Guardian website: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/feb/28/philip-french-best-hollywood-films
French, P. (2010, February 27). How 100 years of Hollywood have charted the history of America. Retrieved from The Guardian website: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/feb/28/philip-french-best-hollywood-films
The Rise of
Hollywood and the Arrival of Sound. (2016). Retrieved from UH - Digital History
website: http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/topic_display.cfm?tcid=124

I've seen several movie theaters around my hometown close or go through renovations within the past 10 years or so. I feel as though the newer theaters that are popping up are providing more hedonic value through added features, such as more comfortable, reclining seats, 3D, 4D and IMAX movies that are more interactive and engaging, bars and restaurants, etc (Babin & Harris, 2016). These newer features create more of an experience going to the theaters that can be more appealing for some consumers.
ReplyDeleteBabin, B. J., & Harris, E. G. (2016). CB (Vol. 7), 28 – 29.
Movies are one of my favorite pastimes, but I can state that the hedonic value decreases when you watch films in your sofa. Customer usually have the feeling that theater experience gives more hedonic value as mentioned. However, it might not all be a bad thing to watch films at your living room. It is true that the consumer gives less time and money to watch the program and may not get as much value at home. Home watching experience and what value you get, can be less expensive and more convenient (Babin & Harris, 2014) and therefore create the same amount of value for consumer.
ReplyDeleteBabin, B. J., & Harris, E. G. (2014). Consumer behavior (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.